GH v ALCOCK, 2012 ABQB 166


7.3: Summary Judgment (Application and decision)

Case Summary

One of the Defendants applied for Summary Judgement. Thomas J. stated that the relevant principles for such an Application are set out in paragraph 17 of Murphy Oil Company Ltd v Predator Corporation Ltd, 2004 ABQB 688. Further, Thomas J. relied upon Kwan v Superfly Inc, 2011 ABQB 343, Manufacturers Life Insurance Co v Executive Centre at Manulife Place Inc, 2011 ABQB 189, and BA Capital Inc v Stream Oil & Gas Ltd, 2011 ABQB 91, for the proposition that Rule 7.3 operates in the same manner and follows the same legal principals as its precursor, former Rule 159.

View CanLII Details