SNAYCHUK v EDMONTON (CITY), 2020 ABQB 1
3.68: Court options to deal with significant deficiencies
9.4: Signing judgments and orders
This was an Application reviewed by Associate Chief Justice Nielsen as being an Apparently Vexatious Application or Proceeding (“AVAP”). Pursuant to Civil Practice Note 7, Associate Chief Justice Nielsen ordered that the Applicant had 14 days to provide written submissions to the Court to “show cause” as to why the AVAP should not be struck pursuant to Rule 3.68.
Associate Chief Justice Nielsen also ruled that the Applicant’s approval of the Order granted was dispensed with pursuant to Rule 9.4(2)(c).View CanLII Details