Back to Rules Database
View CanLII Details
Rule Details
FUFA v UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA
Rules Discussed
- Rule 3.68 Court options to deal with significant deficiencies
- Rule 7.3 Summary Judgment (Application and decision)
Case Summary
The Appellant appealed a Master’s Decision dismissing his suit against the Respondent University. The Action was commenced via a Statement of Claim, and alleged tort and breach of contract. The Action related to the Appellant’s forced withdrawal from a doctoral program due to academic issues.
The Court upheld the Master’s Decision. The grounds for dismissal were:
(a) The Court had no jurisdiction regarding Claims of an academic nature [Rule 3.68(2)(a)];
(b) The allegations regarding tortious conduct were frivolous [Rule 3.68(2)(c)];
(c) The Claim was an attempt to circumvent Legislation granting Universities autonomy, and thus was an abuse of process [ Rule 3.68(2)(d)]; and
(d) There was no merit to the Claim [Rule 7.3(1)(b)].