TOMA v ALBERTA (SERVICE), 2021 ABQB 110
3.68: Court options to deal with significant deficiencies
9.4: Signing judgments and orders
This was an Application reviewed by Associate Chief Justice Nielsen as being an Apparently Vexatious Application or Proceeding (“AVAP”). Pursuant to Civil Practice Note No 7, Nielsen A.C.J. ordered that the Applicants had 14 days to provide written submissions to the Court to “show cause” as to why the AVAP should not be struck pursuant to Rule 3.68.
Associate Chief Justice Nielsen also ruled that the Applicants’ approval of the Order granted was dispensed with pursuant to Rule 9.4(2)(c).View CanLII Details